Jolly Boatman/Hampton Court station appeal inquiry

CD1 Plans and drawings submitted for approval

• 1.1 Drawing Schedule 
• 1.2 Existing Site Plan (Demolition)
• 1.3 Location Plan
• 1.4 Tree Survey
• 1.5 Tree Protection Plan
• 1.6 Station Demolition Plan 
  
• 1.7 Proposed Lower Ground Floor Plan
  
• 1.8 Proposed Basement Plan
  
• 1.9 Proposed Lower Ground Floor Plan (Tenure and Use Plan)
• 1.10 Proposed Basement (Tenure and Use Plan) 
  
• 1.11 Proposed Long Site Section and Elevation
  
• 1.12 Riverside Building - North Elevation Bay
  
• 1.13 Riverside Building - West Elevation Bay
  
• 1.14 Riverside Building (Level 01)
  
• 1.15 Riverside Building (Level 01)
  
• 1.16 Riverside Building (Level 03)
  
• 1.17 Tree Protection Plan
  
• 1.18 Station Demolition Plan 
• 1.19 Proposed Lower Ground Floor Plan
  
• 1.20 Proposed Basement Plan
  
• 1.21 Proposed Lower Ground Floor Plan (Tenure and Use Plan)
  
• 1.22 Proposed Basement (Tenure and Use Plan) 
  
• 1.23 Proposed Long Site Section and Elevation
  
• 1.23 Proposed Long Site Section and Elevation 
• 1.24 Villa 1 (Level 00) 
• 1.25 Villa 1 (Level 01) 
  
• 1.26 Villa 1 (Level 02) 
  
• 1.27 HCW Building (Level 01) 
  
• 1.28 HCW Building (Level 02) 
  
• 1.29 Typical Hotel Units
  
• 1.30 Existing Site Plan 
  
• 1.31 Soft Landscape Plan 
  
• 1.32 Hard Landscape Plan 
  
• 1.33 Proposed Highway Layout 
  
• 1.34 Proposed Works Service Road 
  
• 1.35 Dimensioned Plan - Elevations 
  
• 1.36 Dimensioned Plan - Lower Ground Floor 
  
• 1.37 Dimensioned Plan – Basement 
• 1.38 Riverside Building - East Elevation Bay 
  
• 1.39 Site Sections 
• 1.40 Fire Tender Swept Path Tracking 
  
• 1.41 Existing and Proposed Sections (P-P) 
• 1.42 Existing and Proposed Sections (Q-Q)
• 1.43 Existing and Proposed Sections (R-R) 
• 1.44 Existing and Proposed Sections (S-S)  

CD2 Amended plans

• 2.1 Drawing Register 
• 2.2 Masterplan
• 2.3 Proposed Roof Floor Plan
• 2.4 Proposed Site Section and Elevation (Riverside Building)
• 2.5 HCW Building - North Bay Elevation
• 2.6 HCW Building (Hotel) West Elevation Bay
• 2.7 HCW Building (Residential) West Elevation Bay
• 2.8 HCW Building (Hotel) East Elevation Bay
• 2.9 Proposed East and West Elevations
• 2.10 Proposed East Elevation (HCW) and Section (Villa, HCW and Residential)
• 2.11 Proposed Sections (Villa and HCW Building Hotel)
• 2.12 Proposed Site Plan (Ground Floor)
• 2.13 Proposed Ground Floor (Tenure and Use Plan)
• 2.14 Proposed Ground Floor Plan
• 2.15 Proposed First Floor (Tenure and Use Plan)
• 2.16 Proposed First Floor Plan
• 2.17 Proposed Second Floor (Tenure and Use Plan) 
• 2.18 Proposed Second Floor Plan 
• 2.19 Proposed Third Floor (Tenure and Use Plan) 
• 2.20 Proposed Third Floor Plan  
• 2.21 Proposed Roof Plan
• 2.22 Villa - East Elevation Bay 
• 2.23 Villa - West Elevation Bay  
• 2.24 Proposed North and South Elevations
• 2.25 Dimensioned Plan - Site Plan 

CD3 Supporting documents

• 3.1 Arboricultural Survey and Impact Assessment
• 3.2 BREEAM New Construction 2014 Pre Assessment
• 3.3 Car Parking Report
• 3.4 Design and Access Statement
• 3.5 Energy Statement  
• 3.6 Environmental Statement
• 3.7 Environmental Statement (Figures)
• 3.8 Environmental Statement Appendix 10.1 Glossary of Acoustic Terminology
• 3.9 Environmental Statement Appendix 10.2 Baseline Noise Survey
• 3.10 Environmental Statement Appendix 10.3 Demolition and Construction Noise Assessment 
• 3.11 Environmental Statement Appendix 10.4 Operational Road Traffic Noise Assessment
• 3.12 Environmental Statement Appendix 11.1 Flood Risk Assessment
• 3.13 Environmental Statement Appendix 11.2 Drainage Management Plan
• 3.14 Environmental Statement Appendix 12.1 Preliminary Environmental Risk Assessment
• 3.15 Environmental Statement Appendix 13.1 Archaeological DBA
• 3.16 Environmental Statement Appendix 13.2 Relevant Historic Environment Record Gazette
• 3.17 Environmental Statement Appendix 14.1 Consultation
• 3.18 Environmental Statement Appendix 14.2 Preliminary Ecological Appraisal
• 3.19 Environmental Statement Appendix 14.3 Bat Survey Report (Buildings and Activity)
• 3.20 Environmental Statement Appendix 14.4 Bat Survey Report (Trees)
• 3.21 Environmental Statement Appendix 14.5 Lighting Proposals
• 3.22 Environmental Statement Appendix 15.1 Wind Microclimate Desk Study
• 3.23 Environmental Statement Appendix 16.1 Drawings
• 3.24 Environmental Statement Appendix 16.2 Daylight Sunlight assessment
• 3.25 Environmental Statement Appendix 16.3 Overshadowing Results
• 3.26 Environmental Statement Appendix 16.4 Solar Glare Results
• 3.27 Environmental Statement Appendix 2.1 EIA Scoping Report
• 3.28 Environmental Statement Appendix 2.2 EIA Scoping Opinion
• 3.29 Environmental Statement Appendix 7.1 and 7.2 Pop and Child Yield Calcs
• 3.30 Environmental Statement Appendix 8.1 Transport Assessment
• 3.31 Environmental Statement Appendix 9.1 Consultation with EBC Environmental Health
• 3.32 Environmental Statement Appendix 9.2 Air Quality Assessment Detailed Methodology
• 3.33 Environmental Statement Appendix 9.3 Air Quality Modelling Results
• 3.34 Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary
• 3.35 Internal Daylight, Sunlight and Overshading Assessment
• 3.36 Noise and Vibration (Assessment of Residential Amenity)
• 3.37 Operational Waste Management Strategy
• 3.38 Planning Statement
• 3.39 Statement of Community Involvement
• 3.40 Sustainability Statement
• 3.41 Air Quality Report 2021 
• 3.42 Flood Risk Assessment 2021 
• 3.43 Environmental Statement – Visual Impact Assessment 
  
• 3.44 Environmental Statement – Appendix 1 Draft Conservation Report 2003 
  

• 3.45 Addendum Built Heritage, Townscape and Visual Impact Assessment – March 2020

CD4 Consultation responses

• 4.1 Sarah Rutherford’s HIA         
• 4.2  Consultation responses from Historic Royal Palaces
• 4.3  Consultation responses from Gardens Trust 
  

CD5 Policy documents

• 5.1 The National Planning Policy Framework 2021
• 5.2 National Planning policy Guidance
• 5.3 Elmbridge Core Strategy 2011
• 5.4 Elmbridge Development Management Plan 2015
• 5.5 Hampton Court Station and Jolly Boatman Sites Development Brief 1999
• 5.6 Design and Character SPD 2012
• 5.7 Design and Character Supplementary Planning Document Companion Guide: East & West Molesey 2012
• 5.8 Development Contributions Supplementary Planning Document July 2020 (updated April 2021)
• 5.9 Parking Supplementary Planning Document July 2020
• 5.10 The Thames Landscape Strategy 1994 and the Character Reach 02 Hampton Court
• 5.11 East Molesey Kent Town Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Proposals 2012
• 5.12 Land Availability Assessment 2021
• 5.13 Local Housing Needs Assessment 2020
• 5.14 Local Housing Needs Assessment- Addendum 2021
• 5.15 Elmbridge Borough Council Housing Delivery Action Plan 2020
• 5.16 Kingston and North Surrey Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) 2016
• 5.17 Authority Monitoring Report 2020-21
• 5.18 Elmbridge Borough Strategic Views Study (2019)
• 5.19 Elmbridge Heritage Strategy (2015)
• 5.20 Historic England Good Practice Advice in Planning Note, No. 3 – The Setting of Heritage Assets
• 5.21 Historic England Good Practice Advice Note, No. 2, ‘Managing Significance in Decision-Taking in the Historic Environment’
• 5.22 Draft Local Plan March 2022
• 5.23 National Design Guide 2019
• 5.24 CABE’s judging criteria

• 5.25 The Thames Landscape Strategy Review 2012

CD6 Documents in determination of A

• 6.1 Minutes of the Meeting
• 6.2 Officer Committee report
• 6.3 Committee updates
• 6.4 Committee minutes
• 6.5 Decision notice

CD7 Appeals decisions and case law

• 7.1 Inspectors’ Report, Units 1&2 Hampton Court Trading Estate, Summer Road, Thames Ditton KT7 0RG:  APP/K3605/W/20/3257401
• 7.2 Bedford BC v SSCLG [2013] EWHC 2847 (Admin)
• 7.3 City and Country Bramshill Limited v SSCLG [2021] EWCA CW 320
• 7.4 SoS Decision and Inspector’s Report, Citroen Site: APP/G6100/V/19/3226914
• 7.5 SoS Decision and Inspector’s Report, 40 and 40A High Street Brentford: APP/F5540/V/19/3226900
• 7.6 Barwell v East Hants [2014] EWCA Civ 137 
• 7.7 Juden V London Borough of Tower Hamlets & Ors EWHC 1368 (Admin)

CD8 Appeal A documents

• 8.1 Appeal Form
• 8.123 Dr Miele Proof of Evidence
  

• 8.124 CIL Regulation 122 Statement

• 8.125 Heritage Statement of Common Ground

• 8.2 Statement of Common Ground
• 8.3 Start Date Letter
• 8.4 Statement of Case
• 8.5 Questionnaire
• 8.6 3P Reps - SCC LLFA
• 8.7 Details of Rule 6 Party
• 8.8 EOT for Appeal Statement
• 8.9 Confirmation of Rule 6 Party - Hampton Court Rescue
• 8.10 Rule 6 Party - Hampton Court Rescue Campaign
• 8.11 LPA Statement of Case
  
• 8.12 LPA Statement of Case - Appendix 1
  
• 8.126 Draft S106 Agreement
  
• 8.13 LPA Statement of Case - Appendix 2
  
• 8.14 LPA Statement of Case - Appendix 3
• 8.15 Statement of Common Ground
• 8.16 Email Correspondence Re Flood Modelling  
• 8.17 Email exchange with LPA re SWRA Act  
• 8.18 Letter to Dominic Raab from Grant Shapps  
• 8.19 Statement of Case - Andrew Roberts  
• 8.20 Statement of Case - Keith Garner  
• 8.21 Hampton Court Station Views Taken by MS Environmental
• 8.22 Notes from CMC
• 8.23 Statement of Common Ground – Final
• 8.24 3P Reps
• 8.25 3P Reps – HCRC
• 8.26 Email regarding Site Visit from Hampton Court Palace
• 8.27 Financial Viability Assessment Appended
• 8.28 Agent change of details
• 8.29 Appellant - Visual Impact Study
• 8.30 Mr Garner - Viewpoint 1
• 8.31 Mr Garner - Viewpoint 10
• 8.32 Mr Garner - Viewpoint 11  
• 8.33 Mr Garner - Viewpoint 12  
• 8.34 Mr Garner - Viewpoint 2  
• 8.35 Mr Garner - Viewpoint 3  
• 8.36 Mr Garner - Viewpoint 4  
• 8.37 Mr Garner - Viewpoint 5  
• 8.38 Mr Garner - Viewpoint 6  
• 8.39 Mr Garner - Viewpoint 7  
• 8.40 Mr Garner - Viewpoint 8  
• 8.41 Mr Garner - Viewpoint 9  
• 8.42 Mr Garner -Technical Methodology
• 8.43 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 2A 
• 8.44 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 2B 
• 8.45 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 3 
• 8.46 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 4 
• 8.47 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 5 
• 8.48 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 6 
• 8.49 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 7 
• 8.50 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 8 
• 8.51 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 9 
• 8.52 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 10 
• 8.53 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 11
• 8.54 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 1a 
  
• 8.55 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 1b
• 8.56 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 1c 
• 8.57 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 1d  
• 8.58 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 1e
• 8.59 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 1f
• 8.60 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 1g
• 8.61 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 1h
• 8.62 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 1i
• 8.63 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 1j 
• 8.64 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 1k 
• 8.65 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 1l 
• 8.66 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 1m
• 8.67 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 12a 
• 8.68 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 12b  
• 8.69 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 12c  
• 8.70 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 12d 
• 8.71 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 12e 
• 8.72 3P Reps HCRC - Appendix 12f 
• 8.73 Proof of Evidence - Mike Spence 
• 8.74 HCRC (Andrew Roberts) Proof of Evidence  
• 8.75 HCRC (Andrew Roberts) Proof of Evidence - Appendix 1  
• 8.76 HCRC (Andrew Roberts) Proof of Evidence - Appendix 2 EBC legal Opinion  
• 8.77 James Owens Proof of Evidence  
• 8.78 James Owens Proof of Evidence - Appendix 1  
• 8.79 James Owens Proof of Evidence – Summary  
• 8.80 Paul Finch Proof of Evidence - Design Statement  
• 8.81 Clemons - Proof of Evidence  
• 8.82 Clemons - Summary of Proof of Evidence  
• 8.83 Dr Miele Proof of Evidence - Appendix 1  
• 8.84 Dr Miele Proof of Evidence - Appendix 2  
• 8.85 Dr Miele Proof of Evidence - Appendix 3  
• 8.86 Dr Miele Proof of Evidence - Appendix 4  
• 8.87 Dr Miele Proof of Evidence - Appendix 5  
• 8.88 Dr Miele Proof of Evidence - Appendix 6  
• 8.89 Dr Miele Proof of Evidence - Appendix 7  
• 8.90 Dr Miele Proof of Evidence - Appendix 8  
• 8.91 Dr Miele Proof of Evidence – Summary  
• 8.92 Proof of Evidence - Dr Sarah Rutherford  
• 8.93 Summary Proof of Dr Sarah Rutherford  
• 8.94 Proof of Evidence - Mr Paul Velluet  
• 8.95 Summary Proof of Mr Paul Velluet  
• 8.96 Proof of Evidence - Mr Keith Garner  
• 8.97 Proof of Evidence - Keith Garner - Appendix A  
• 8.98 Proof of Evidence - Keith Garner - Appendix B  
• 8.99 Proof of Evidence - Keith Garner - Appendix C  
• 8.100 Proof of Evidence - Keith Garner - Appendix D  
• 8.101 Proof of Evidence - Keith Garner - Appendix E  
• 8.102 Proof of Evidence - Keith Garner - Appendix F  
• 8.103 Proof of Evidence - Keith Garner - Appendix G  
• 8.104 Proof of Evidence - Keith Garner - Appendix H  
• 8.105 Proof of Evidence - Keith Garner - Appendix I  
• 8.106 Proof of Evidence - Keith Garner - Appendix J  
• 8.107 Proof of Evidence - Keith Garner - Appendix K  
• 8.108 Proof of Evidence - Keith Garner - Appendix L  
• 8.109 Proof of Evidence - Keith Garner - Appendix M  
• 8.110 Proof of Evidence - Keith Garner - Appendix N  
• 8.111 Proof of Evidence - Keith Garner - Appendix O  
• 8.112 Proof of Evidence - Keith Garner - Appendix P  
• 8.113 Proof of Evidence - Keith Garner - List of Appended Documents A-P  
• 8.114 Summary Proof of Mr Keith Garner  
• 8.115 Rebuttal of James Owens Proof of Evidence by Andrew Roberts  
• 8.116 Rebuttal of James Owens Proof of Evidence by Andrew Roberts – Appendix  
• 8.117 Rebuttal Planning Proof by James Owens  
• 8.118 Rebuttal Planning Proof by James Owens  
• 8.119 Rebuttal Proof of Evidence - Dr Chris Miele  
• 8.120 Rebuttal Statement - Dr Sarah Rutherford  
• 8.121 Rebuttal Statement - Paul Velluet  
• 8.122 LPA Rebuttal 

CD9 Appeal B Core Documents

• 9.1 Application form 
• 9.2 Block Plan (General Arrangement)
• 9.3 Location Plan 
• 9.4 Proposed Site Plan
• 9.5 Indicative Temporary Car Park Access Phasing Plan
• 9.6 Arboricultural Impact Assessment – Addendum
• 9.7 Arboricultural Survey and Impact Assessment 
• 9.8 Flood Risk Assessment 
• 9.9 Officer Report
• 9.10 Decision Notice
• 9.11 Appeal Form 
• 9.12 Statement of Common Ground

CD10 Documents requested by Rule 6 Party

• 10.1 Assessment of Alexpo Parking Report and Transport Assessment 
  
• 10.2 HCRC – Ember River 
  
• 10.3 HCRC – Parking  
  
• 10.4 HCRC – Network Rail letter on parking
• 10.5 HCRC – South Western Railways and Network Rail parking clarification 
  
• 10.6 HCRC – Information request on parking 
  
• 10.7 HCRC – Updated viability report – HCRC notes 
  
• 10.8 HCRC – Meeting Notes Network Rail Property MD 
  
• 10.9 HCRC – Parking Defined By ORR 
  
• 10.10 HCRC – Viability note ORR 
  
• 10.11 HCRC – Draft Officer report 
  
• 10.12 HCRC – Station Layby 
  
• 10.13 HCRC – Early review mechanism
  

• 10.14 Dimensioned Plan - Site Plan Revision P1 

• 10.15 Update Statement: carparking, financial viability, ecology

• 10.16 Agent response to greenspaces consultation

• 10.17 Consultation Response - London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames
  

• 10.18 Updated CGI – 06/03/2019
  

• 10.19 Correspondence from Agent 01.03.2019

• 10.20 Financial Viability Assessment – December 2018